Opioid-Abatement Toolkit

Opioid-Abatement Toolkit

Communiversity Developed and Tested

Opioids 101 and Addiction: Part 3

The Politics of Drug Laws

By knowing what has happened in the past, you can be aware of what might happen again in the future. Laws and regulations often go in cycles. A consistent feature of U.S. laws on drugs is their racist nature. Listen to the current politicians discussing safety and crime control and the debates on drugs; then, think: what do their ideas mean for you and your community? Will more funding for crime control mean more crackdowns in your community and targeting of Black and Brown people? Don’t be a couch potato — find out who is running for election — not just for president but in your local area. Then, get out to vote. The people you elect are the people who will be making laws that will affect you and your family. By voting, you can change the course of history. 

Racial Disparity

Black Americans

Black Americans use illicit drugs at similar rates as Whites but are six to ten times more likely to be incarcerated for drug offenses (Bigg, 2007; Goode, 2013), leading to a higher proportion of Blacks in prison (Nellis, 2021).

Hispanic Americans

As Hispanic/Latinos are one of the fastest growing minority populations— expected to comprise nearly 30 percent of the U.S. population by 2060 — it becomes imperative to understand the unique sociocultural factors that influence drug use and access to prevention, treatment, and recovery in this population. 

Opioid Epidemic Timeline

Opium Den Ordinance
1937
Harrison Narcotics Act
1968
Anti-drug Abuse Act
2010
First Step Act
1875
Marijuana Tax Act
1914
Nixon’s War on Drugs
1986
Fair Sentencing Act
2018

Historical Evolution of Drug Laws

1875 — Opium Den Ordinance

The 1875 Opium Den Ordinance was the nation’s first anti-drug law, banning opium dens. The ordinance was directed at Chinese immigrants and led to racial disparities in drug policies and addiction treatment (Mark, 1975)

1920 — Mexican Revolution

The Mexican Revolution in 1910 led to the immigration of Mexicans to the U.S. Southwest. Some immigrants brought marijuana with them. Texas police officers claimed that marijuana aroused a “lust for blood,” leading to violent crimes. In 1914, El Paso, Texas was the first city to ban the sale or possession of marijuana (Schlosser, 1994).

1937 — Marijuana Tax Act

The Marijuana Tax Act of 1937 targeted Mexican Americans, with increased penalties for drug possession.

Poster promoting the movie The Weed with Roots in Hell (1936)

1914 — Harrison Narcotics Act

In 1914, the U.S. Congress passed the Harrison Narcotics Tax Act, imposing “a special tax” upon all persons who produce, import, manufacture, compound, deal in, dispense, sell, distribute, or give away opium or coca leaves, their salts, derivatives, or preparations, and for other purposes.” This law banned doctors from prescribing opioid-based drugs, leading to the arrest and imprisonment of many doctors, which led to underground markets of opioids and cocaine and increased police enforcement, according to the Institute of Medicine (1992).

A History of the War on Drugs

What is the Drug War? With Jay‑Z & Molly Crabapple

The Drug Policy Alliance has teamed up with artists Jay­-Z and Molly Crabapple to tell the brief history of how the Drug War went from prohibition to the gold rush of the legalized cannabis industry. Do you know your history?

1970 — The Comprehensive Sentencing Act

The Comprehensive Sentencing Act of 1970, signed by Richard Nixon, was a precursor to his declaration of the War on Drugs a year later, which contained punitive sentencing guidelines. The War on Drugs in 1971 reversed mid-century civil rights and Great Society commitments, which focused on social programs to address poverty and, subsequently, crime.

The drug war legislation expanded the scope of criminal justice and culminated in decades-long mass incarceration by:

  • Increasing mandatory minimum sentencing
  • Using plea bargaining
  • Implementing drug raids and asset forfeiture
  • Allocating funds for policing and the building of state prisons
  • The broadening of state surveillance

1986 — Anti-Drug Abuse Act

Systemic racism in drug policy is also recognizable in the Anti-Drug Abuse Act of 1986, “which enacted a 100-fold greater sentencing disparity for water-soluble cocaine base (‘crack’) versus powder cocaine,” according to ASAM’s policy statement.

  • The distribution of just five grams of crack cocaine, most heavily prosecuted within Black communities, triggered a mandatory minimum sentence of five years in federal prison, reflecting significant racial disparities in drug policy enforcement.
  • Distributing 500 grams of powder cocaine — more commonly associated with White users — carried the same mandatory minimum sentence, underscoring the sentencing disparity between crack and powder cocaine offenses.

The law resulted in the arrest of a disproportionate number of Blacks compared to Whites.

  • Triggered by the abolition of slavery, many Whites advocated that formerly enslaved people be sent back to Africa or remain under control. Whites’ fear for their safety led them to seek ways to control the Black population. Part of this was through the war on drugs.
  • The war on drugs reinforced racial hierarchies through differential enforcement and perception about what constitutes addiction (Netherland & Hansen, 2017). It subjected millions to criminalization, incarceration, and lifelong criminal records, disrupting or eliminating access to adequate resources and support to live healthy lives (Cohen et al., 2022).
  • The effects of the war on drugs include the expenses families suffer from the loss of the economic contributions of incarcerated family members and the need for extra help for the children of incarcerated parents (Wagner & Rabuy, 2017; Sawyer, & Wagner, 2023). Further more, the children of incarcerated parents are subject to additional risk factors of substance misuse.
  • In the case of opioids, addiction treatment is being selectively “pharmaceuticalized” to preserve a protected space for White opioid users while leaving intact a punitive system for Black and Brown individuals who use drugs (Netherland & Hansen, 2017)
Carson, “Prisoners in 2013,” Table 14; Bureau of Justice Statistics, “Federal Justice Statistics Program.”

“The War on Drugs That Wasn’t: Wasted Whiteness, ‘Dirty Doctors,’ and Race in Media Coverage of Prescription Opioid Misuse.”

Racism and the War on Drugs

Smith College School for Social Work in Conversation with Leigh-Anne Francis, Ph.D.

Racism and the War on Drugs
President Barack Obama signs the Fair Sentencing Act in the Oval Office, Aug. 3, 2010. Joining him, from left are, -unknown-, Attorney General Eric Holder, Sen. Patrick Leahy, D-Vt., Rep. Bobby Scott, D-Va., Senate Majority Whip Richard Durbin, of Ill., Sen. Jeff Sessions, R-Ala., Sen. Orrin Hatch, R-Utah, and Rep. Sheila Jackson Lee, D-Texas, and Sen. Lindsey Graham, R-SC. (Official White House Photo by Pete Souza)
President Barack Obama at the signing ceremony for the Act. (Photo by Pete Souza) from Washington, DC. Public Domain

2010 — Fair Sentencing Act; 2018 First Step Act

In 2010, Congress passed the Fair Sentencing Act, reducing the sentencing disparity between crack and powder cocaine to 18 to 1. The amount of powder cocaine triggering a minimum sentencing of five and ten years remained unchanged.

In 2018, the First Step Act was signed into law, making sentencing reforms of the Fair Sentencing Act retroactive, but left out those previously arrested for low-level offenses that involved 0 to 5 grams of crack cocaine.

Start Here
Learning Modules
Resources